The New Skills Gap Isn’t Labor — It’s Systems Thinking
If 74% of manufacturing leaders say the skills needed for manufacturing jobs are rapidly changing, we should stop pretending this is only a hiring problem. The hard part isn’t finding “more people.” The hard part is building capability in a workforce that has to operate, troubleshoot, and improve a system that’s getting more complex every year. In glass manufacturing, that complexity shows up everywhere—furnace operations, energy strategy, emissions targets, cullet variability, quality requirements, supply constraints, and customer expectations. That’s why the most urgent gap isn’t labor; it’s how well people can connect the dots.
We see it when a plant “fixes” one issue and accidentally creates another. We see it when a promising technology pilot doesn’t scale because the organization can’t align operations, maintenance, quality, and finance. We see it when data exists, but decisions still get made on instinct because teams don’t trust the system end-to-end. The New Skills Gap Isn’t Labor — It’s Systems Thinking, and glass is one of the clearest examples of why.
Why This Matters Specifically for GMIC and Its Members
GMIC exists to bridge the full glass manufacturing ecosystem—float glass, container, fiber, and specialty—along with associate members that include suppliers, consultants, universities, and glass users. That mix matters, because many of the biggest challenges facing our industry don’t sit neatly inside one department or even one segment. Decarbonization, workforce development, digital modernization, and supply reliability all cut across roles and across the value chain.
As an advocate and convener, GMIC is uniquely positioned to help the industry build shared capability, not just share news. When GMIC runs events, technical programs, and cross-industry conversations, it creates a place where systems thinking can be taught, practiced, and normalized. That is exactly what the industry needs: fewer isolated fixes, more integrated learning.
From a member perspective, systems thinking is also a competitive advantage. It reduces scrap, improves uptime, strengthens quality consistency, and helps plants adapt faster when conditions change. When organizations invest in systems thinking, they’re not just “training.” They’re improving outcomes across safety, productivity, sustainability, and profitability at the same time.
What Systems Thinking Looks Like on the Plant Floor
Systems thinking isn’t a whiteboard exercise. It shows up as behaviors that are easy to recognize:
- Better problem framing
Instead of “the line is down,” the conversation becomes “what upstream and downstream conditions made this failure likely?” That shift alone changes how quickly teams stabilize and how often the same problem returns. - Stronger handoffs between functions
A systems-thinking team doesn’t throw problems over the fence. Maintenance understands production pressures; production understands maintenance constraints; quality understands what’s realistically controllable and what requires process redesign. - Decisions that account for tradeoffs
Glass manufacturing is full of tradeoffs: throughput versus defects, energy efficiency versus stability, cullet content versus quality risk, short-term fixes versus long-term reliability. Systems thinkers don’t pretend the tradeoffs don’t exist—they manage them explicitly. - Learning that spreads
When one plant or line discovers a meaningful improvement, systems thinking helps standardize it and replicate it. Without that mindset, improvements stay trapped in one shift, one team, or one facility.
This is why The New Skills Gap Isn’t Labor — It’s Systems Thinking. It’s the difference between “we’re busy” and “we’re improving.”
Why the Old Training Model Isn’t Enough Anymore
Traditional training often produces specialists who are excellent inside a narrow scope. That worked better when systems changed slowly and technology upgrades were rare. Today, the pace is different. Plants are managing newer sensors, more automation, more data, more alternative fuel conversations, tighter sustainability demands, and a more complex workforce pipeline.
The problem is not that specialization is bad. The problem is that specialization alone can create blind spots. You can have a strong operator who doesn’t see how a small change upstream affects defects downstream. You can have a strong engineer who designs an improvement that operations can’t sustain. You can have a strong sustainability plan that fails because it doesn’t fit how the plant actually runs.
What we need now is depth plus connection. Strong “vertical” skills, plus the “horizontal” ability to collaborate across the system. That’s the real upgrade.
How to Build Systems Thinking Without Turning It Into a Buzzword
Here are practical moves that work in real plants—no fluff, no gimmicks:
1) Teach the process as a system, not a set of jobs
Instead of training people only on tasks, train them on cause-and-effect pathways. Make it normal for operators, maintenance, and quality to learn how decisions travel through melting, forming, annealing, packaging, and shipping.
2) Use cross-functional “fast response” teams for recurring issues
Pick one recurring pain point—defects, downtime, energy spikes—and build a small team across roles. Give them a clear goal, a short timeline, and access to the right data. You’re not just solving a problem; you’re training systems thinking through real work.
3) Build rotations that are short, frequent, and structured
Rotations don’t need to be six months long to work. Even short rotations—done intentionally—help people understand constraints and priorities outside their home role. The key is to tie rotations to outcomes: yield, uptime, safety, energy, or quality.
4) Make “tradeoff conversations” part of everyday leadership
When leaders model tradeoff thinking out loud, teams learn faster. Say the quiet part: “We can push speed, but here’s the risk,” or “We can raise cullet percentage, but here’s what we must control.” That behavior is systems thinking in action.
5) Connect digital tools to decision-making, not dashboards
More dashboards won’t fix anything if people don’t trust the data or can’t apply it. The goal is decision confidence: what changed, why it matters, and what we’re doing next. That’s how data becomes operational advantage.
Where GMIC Can Help Accelerate This Shift
GMIC’s strength is convening the right mix of producers, suppliers, researchers, and educators across all glass segments. That’s the perfect environment to develop systems thinking at scale—by sharing proven training approaches, spotlighting what’s working in member facilities, and translating technical learning into practical playbooks.
It can also happen through peer learning: one company’s approach to cross-training, another’s approach to digital adoption, another’s approach to sustainability integration. Systems thinking grows faster when people see real examples, not theory.
JOIN GMIC